Thursday, June 14, 2012

REVIEW: 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display


Apple's Retina display technology has finally crossed over from the iOS world and made its way onto a Mac. I spent a few days with Apple's latest and greatest portable computer and explored all of the new features. Read on for my full review.

What's new outside
MagSafe 2, Two Thunderbolt ports, a USB 3.0 port, and the headphone jack

When you first see the new 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display you won't initially notice a huge cosmetic difference between it and previous 15" models. It is slightly slimmer and the screen bezel itself is distinctive, but the familiar silver aluminum unibody design is still there along with the standard chiclet keyboard and the machined speaker grills. 
SDXC card reader, HDMI port, and another USB 3.0 port
As you look closer at the system the latest tweaks become more apparent. A look at the sides of the system reveal a new port layout. Most notably the system now includes USB 3.0 ports, something that Apple previously ignored while in the midst of touting its Thunderbolt interface. Although you wouldn't know it just from looking at them as Apple has chosen to leave the USB ports colored the same as usual rather than following the PC trend of coloring USB 3.0 ports blue. You get one USB 3.0 port on each side of the system. Thunderbolt is still included and Apple has even thrown in an extra port this time around so there are two Thunderbolt ports, both on the left side of the system. Another new port to appear is a true HDMI port. Located on the right side of the system the HDMI port allows you to plug the computer directly into your TV. You can drive up to two external displays using any combination of the Thunderbolt and HDMI ports for connections.
The new MagSafe 2 connector
Apple has also opted to switch to a new version of their MagSafe power connection. Dubbed MagSafe 2 the new connection is slimmer than the previous generation and of course requires a different power adapter.
The cooling system intake vents are cleverly hidden under the side edges
A headphone jack/audio out port is still in place as is the SDXC card reader. Notably missing is an audio in port, an Ethernet port, a FireWire 800 port,  a Kensington lock slot, the battery level indicator lights, and perhaps most boldly of all, any type of optical drive, all of which were included on the previous 15" MacBook Pro (and are actually still included on the new non-Retina 15" MacBook Pro).
The cooling system output vents stretch along the entire hinge edge
Closer inspection of the outside of the system reveals Apple's redesigned cooling system that uses fans on each side of the case to suck cool air in through cleverly hidden side vents and then blow the hot air out through a wide panel of vents positioned along the hinge edge of the system. Apple claims that their new fan design produces less disturbing noise by utilizing an asymmetrical blade design that varies the tonal range of the noise coming from the fans.
The new power button placement
Longtime MacBook Pro users will also notice that the power button has now been moved to the main keyboard in place of the no longer needed DVD eject button. The MacBook Pro text that has traditionally been printed right below the screen is no more, although it does make an encore appearance on the bottom of the system.
The MacBook Pro text has moved from the screen to the underside


What's new inside
Inside the 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display is your choice of three quad-core Intel Ivy Bridge i7 processors (2.3GHz, 2.6GHz, or 2.7GHz). All models come standard with solid-state drives in sizes ranging from 256GB all the way up to 768GB. Your RAM choices are either 8GB or 16GB. 

Of course the star of the show is the Retina display panel which comes in at a whopping 2880x1800 resolution. Driving the display on all models is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 1GB of DDR5 memory. When you aren't needing the rendering power of the discrete graphics chipset the system switches to the new Intel Graphics 4000 HD integrated graphics set for better power management.

The 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display is offered in two default setups. The first comes with a 2.3GHz processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB solid-state drive and sells for $2,199. The second setup bumps the processor up to 2.6GHz and the drive up to 512GB and sells for a wallet-hurting $2,799. The RAM on either setup can be increased to 16GB for an extra $200 through a build-to-order option. Additionally, on the higher end model you can increase the drive size to 768GB for a steep $500 additional and can bump the processor up to 2.7GHz for $250.

There's no arguing that all configurations of this system are expensive, but if you were to max out the system with the 2.7GHz processor, 16GB of RAM, and the 768GB drive you are looking at a sky-high $3,749.

The kicker with these configuration options is that the system has no user upgradable parts. The solid-state drive is an Apple proprietary design and the RAM is actually soldered into the system. You can't go back later and decide you want more storage space or more RAM. Whatever you buy on Day One is what you're stuck with.

The Retina display
So what's the deal with the new Retina display? In order to understand how the Retina screen behaves on the new MacBook Pro we need to review what Apple does when it implements the Retina technology on a device.

Essentially, when a Retina display rolls out to a device (such as the iPhone 4 and the third-generation iPad) Apple doubles both the number of horizontal pixels and the number of vertical pixels while leaving the physical display the same size. Normally this would result in four times as much usable space on the screen, but then of course all of the user interface elements would be four times smaller and harder to see. To compensate for this Apple creates high resolution versions of all of the user interface elements, icons, etc. Basically each element is recreated at four times its original size so that when it's displayed on the Retina display it appears the same size as it did on the non-Retina panel. The difference being that everything appears much sharper since there are really four times as many pixels at work.
The screen at the default 1440x900 view
On the 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display this means that the 2880x1800 panel is actually the equivalent of a traditional 1440x900 display as far as usable space goes. So instead of gaining any more working area on the Retina display you are getting the same space as a 1440x900 display with just a much higher pixel density, resulting in crisper, clearer graphics.

The flip side of this setup is that any programs that have not been optimized to use the Retina display will actually be automatically upscaled by the system (in order to prevent them from appearing very small). This results in many programs and graphics appearing a bit grainy or fuzzy, similar to what you see when you switch back to non-HD channels on your HD TV. Each original pixel from the non-optimized program is being upscaled to take up four pixels on the Retina display.
The screen in 1680x1050 mode
In an interesting twist Apple has included a display setting option that let's you expand the amount of working space by dropping the display out of "Retina" mode. You can change the desktop space to be the equivalent of 1680x1050 or 1920x1200 (in addition to the default 1440x900). The settings menu notes that using these other sizes may result in a performance decrease, presumably because the system still has to load the high resolution graphics as in the "Retina" mode, but then has the added step of downscaling those graphics to the smaller size used on the other desktop sizes.
The screen in 1920x1200 mode


In use
In use the system is a speed demon, which is to be expected when you are running the latest processors coupled with high speed RAM and a solid-state drive. The addition of the USB 3.0 ports really makes file transfers from external hard drives scream. Pretty much all tasks are faster than before on this new system. It is safe to say, as usual with Apple, that the system is very well engineered to the point where even the parts that are hidden inside are a work of art in the way that they are precisely designed and manufactured. With that said, the really distinct difference compared to earlier models is of course the Retina screen.

I'll just come right out and say it, I'm not sold on the new Retina screen on this system. Yes I love the the Retina displays on the iPhone and iPad, but that's because I have never used an iPhone or iPad that had more usable screen. The difference between the MacBook Pro Retina display and the Retina displays of the iPhone and iPad is that this same size screen, 15", has already been offered, and is still offered, by Apple on the MacBook Pro at higher "usable" resolutions. 

For instance, you can still today purchase the non-Retina 15" MacBook Pro with a 1680x1050 display. This non-Retina display actually gives you more working space compared to the 1440x900 space that you get with the Retina model. Personally I would rather have more working space even if I don't get the increased clarity of the Retina-level graphics. It can be argued that on the Retina model you can always switch the graphics mode to provide the same 1680x1050 working area, or an even larger 1920x1200 working area, but doing this, in Apple's own words, "may affect performance". Further, if you just set the Retina display to a non-Retina resolution you are pretty much wasting the more expensive display.

The screen is definitely nice, but I honestly don't see a compelling reason to choose it over a non-Retina display that gives you more working space, especially given the high cost and the non-existent upgrade options. To top it off the Retina display only comes in the glossy variety similar to the MacBook Air without the option for an anti-glare version. Reflections are everywhere unless you are sitting in a dark room.

FINAL THOUGHTS:
The 15" MacBook Pro with Retina display is undoubtably an incredible system, both in performance and engineering. Apple has delivered another stellar product that is currently unmatched by its competitors. However, in its current form this system simply does not offer enough bang for the buck. To compound this Apple simultaneously rolled out a fully updated non-Retina display model, which offers almost identical specs (plus a few items that aren't even options on the Retina model) for hundreds of dollars less. 

As a comparison let's look at the non-Retina 15" model with the same 2.6GHz processor found in the high end Retina model. It comes with the same 8GB of RAM but it can be easily user upgraded in the future to 16GB. It comes with USB 3.0 ports, and a Thunderbolt port but also includes a Firewire 800 port, an Ethernet port, and a DVD drive. You can build it to order with the high resolution 1680x1050 anti-glare display and a 7800RPM 750GB hard drive for $2,349. Compared to the Retina display model with the same processor and same RAM you save $450 over the Retina's $2,799 price tag. The lower priced non-Retina model gets you a better usable resolution (1680x1050 vs 1440x900) and gets you more storage space (750GB vs. 512GB), albeit the Retina model's solid-state drive is much more responsive.

To break it down, you pay $450 more for sharper graphics but a smaller working area on the screen and a faster, yet smaller, drive. In the process you lose the ability to upgrade the RAM, change the drive, connect Firewire devices, or use wired network connections. You also must accept the glossy screen with all of its reflections shining back on you.

I feel as though this system is designed to look svelte sitting on a glass desk or rotating in a TV advertisement, but the reality is that Apple has made the system thinner for really no purpose other than to make it thinner. It's not extremely thin or light like the MacBook Air, and it really isn't that much lighter or easier to carry than the non-Retina MacBook Pro. Unfortunately, this unnecessary thinness is the reason that many of the extra ports and the optical drive have been dropped from the Retina model, and also why the common components such as the storage drive and RAM are not upgradeable. I would have preferred for Apple to keep the same form factor, use standard drives and RAM, and just fill any leftover unused space with bigger batteries.

SUMMARY: 15" MACBOOK PRO WITH RETINA DISPLAY
PROS:

  • Incredible speed from new processors and solid-state drives
  • Beautiful Retina display
  • USB 3.0 finally makes it to the Mac
  • Sleek profile

CONS:

  • Extremely high price, even for Apple
  • Retina display provides less working area than is available on traditional non-Retina 15" MacBook Pro
  • Existing applications have to be updated (possibly at a cost to the user) in order to be optimized for the Retina display
  • No way to switch the interface to use the true 2880x1800 resolution
  • No way to upgrade either RAM or storage - Once you buy the system you are stuck with what it comes with
  • No Firewire port
  • No Ethernet port
  • No DVD drive (the actual drive may not be used by many people, but at the least it provides a space to mount a second storage drive instead of the DVD drive)
  • If you don't care about the Retina display Apple sells a very similar system for less money that offers more expansion options

VERDICT: I realize that this is the first of a new breed of computers from Apple, so the high prices are to be expected, but right now the high price is not justified when you can get what is arguably a better, more future-proof system for $450 less. It doesn't help that this better system comes from Apple as well and sits right next to the Retina equipped model in the store. The display is nice, but it's not that nice. I'm sure Apple has plans to convert all their systems to Retina displays in the future. Hopefully as the technology becomes more common Apple will begin to offer Retina displays that at least match their non-Retina display counterparts in usable space. Right now on the 15" MacBook Pro this would mean that the Retina display would have to handle 3360x2100 (in order to offer the same usable space as the existing 1680x1050 non-Retina model). At its current 1440x900 usable space limit the way Apple has implemented the Retina display on the 15" MacBook Pro just doesn't impress me.

BOTTOM LINE: NOT RECOMMENDED


10 comments:

  1. GREAT review.. And I agree with you.
    I have a 2011 15" High-Res macbook pro and I love the working space..

    I think this is the first try, I wouldn't buy it!
    Maybe in a near future larger working space will come in higher resolution as well. Retina Display 3360X2100!!! Or better...

    Great review, non-biased!
    Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Funny how you fail to mention that a similarly set up legacy MacBook pro with a ssd is actually more then the retina version...

    ReplyDelete
  3. you really compare a HDD and SSD... the SSD retina, or a SSD non-Retina will blow the doors off a HDD model for most users... its not even close. If you put an Apple SSD in that non-Retina, it costs MORE than the Retina machine! The only way your making it look better is because you are acting like a big HDD is better than a smaller SSD.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see your point, but some of us like to be able to upgrade the ram and HD and not be locked into whatever the notebook was manufactured with via soldering. If I could get the MacBook Pro with the Macbook Pro Retina's ports, that's what I'd choose. I'll pass on upgrading until Thunderbolt gets a significant speed boost.

      Delete
    2. The key word is some* the average user is in capable of even adding ram let alone doing a HD swap.

      When they spend over 2k they buy the machine the way they like from the start. Do the same...power users upgrade ever other year anyway...

      Delete
  4. Not a bad review, but sounds a little biased at points.

    Extremely high price, even for Apple
    Have you ever checked the prices on previous macbook pros or current macbook pros with close to the same parts? In comparison, this is flat out a better deal.

    Retina display provides less working area than is available on traditional non-Retina 15" MacBook Pro
    As you already know, you can change the resolution to give the retina display the largest "working area".

    Existing applications have to be updated (possibly at a cost to the user) in order to be optimized for the Retina display
    Agreed, however it is not typical for OSX developers to nickle and dime their customers. I wouldn't be surprised if the future is similar to iOS retina apps: The developers release a free update to those who have paid for the app.

    No way to switch the interface to use the true 2880x1800 resolution
    While this is true, I question if this is really wanted. At some point a resolution increase on a 15" screen will negatively affect usability.

    No Firewire port
    Thunderbolt is backwards compatible with firewire, I see no need in adding redundant firewire ports

    No DVD drive (the actual drive may not be used by many people, but at the least it provides a space to mount a second storage drive instead of the DVD drive)
    I Think I would prefer the thinner lighter chassis.

    If you don't care about the Retina display Apple sells a very similar system for less money that offers more expansion options
    Non-Retina base 15" Macbook pro with 8gb ram, 256gb ssd, and the screen upgrade is $2,499. Compared to retina w/ same specs at $2,199. Top Macbook pro with 512gb ssd and screen upgrade is $3,199 vs $2,799 for retina. Not such a great deal after all huh?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that in comparison, this is a better deal. I was actually shocked when I saw the price. It's less than $3,000 with a 512GB SSD? Awesome!

      The one thing that would make a huge difference to me though, is the drop in working area in comparison to the high-res non-retina 15". You mentioned you can change the working area, but that would result in interpolation, and I'm guessing would look pretty blurry and crappy overall. Unless OS X gets resolution independence, which may happen in the future but I would never bet on it, I would only want to run this at the default resolution. Have you ever tried switching an LCD display to a non-native resolution? Yeah, that's the kind of quality you'd get if you wanted to switch this display to an alternate resolution. Pretty unusable as a graphic designer.

      Speaking of graphic design, your argument about developers releasing free updates will probably happen for apps purchased from the Mac App Store, but I just bought a copy of Adobe CS 5.5 last year and was hoping to hold on to it for another few years. (I can't afford to upgrade every time they release a new version.) Well, can almost guarantee you that Adobe is not going to be releasing new versions of CS 5.5 now that they've moved on to CS 6. That adds another $400 in addition to an external SuperDrive, FireWire adapter, etc.

      By the way, it's unfortunate that Apple dropped the FireWire port, but it's obvious why. It's too tall. Just like the MagSafe plug, it wouldn't fit on the side of the new super-thin design. Unlike the MagSafe plug, however, they can't really re-design the FireWire port. It was easier to just offer a Thunderbolt adapter.

      Delete
  5. Thanks everyone for reading my review.

    Just so you know, I went to the Apple Store three times before I lucked out and got one of two systems that they had for sale on Wednesday morning. I had intended for this to be my new system that I'd be using for awhile. Just wanted to call that out so you don't think I was just bashing the system after looking at it in the store or at a friend's house. I wanted to like this computer.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Here's a few points that I've mentioned to people on other forums. Hopefully this will let you understand my review a little better:

    1. A lot of people have mentioned that my comparison between the Retina and the non-Retina model is not fair because you get the SSD with the Retina model and adding the SSD to the non-Retina model makes it even more expensive than the Retina one. This is true. No argument there from me. My thing is that some people (like myself) may not really care about the SSD and wouldn't normally spend the money to upgrade the non-Retina model with an SSD. My issue with the new system is that Apple forces you to pay the extra money for the SSD even if you don't want it. Obviously this is due to the slimness of the system so I can't fault them for that, but for me it is not worth an extra $450 just to have the SSD when on the non-Retina model you get 50% more storage space with the 750GB 7200RPM HDD. I'd rather have more storage and $450 in my pocket than less storage and the SSD. That's just me though. If you really need the extra speed from the SSD then it might work out different for you. To me it's not worth it when combined with my next point.

    2. I'm not impressed with the screen. If I was in love with the screen then maybe the combination of the Retina screen and the SSD would seem like a good deal to me for $450, but since I don't like the screen at all it kind of throws the whole thing off. I would actually prefer if I could get the "Retina" model without the Retina display. Yes, you can adjust the desktop space to be the same as 1680x1050, or even up to 1920x1200, but if you do that you are defeating the purpose of having the Retina display. The Retina display only works in "Retina mode" at 1440x900. I'd rather have 1680x1050 anti-glare than 1440x900 Retina glossy.

    3. With the above two points in mind (forced to buy SSD, and rather having 1680x1050 anti-glare screen) the loss of the ports and other expansion options didn't go over too well with me. For one pound more and $450 less I get a screen that I like better, more storage (granted it isn't nearly as fast as the SSD), Ethernet port, Firewire port, and an optical drive that I can either use as is, or I can replace it with a second hard drive (maybe even an SSD) if I want to in the future. I can also easily change out the drive and add more RAM without having to spend the money right now on the $200 16GB upgrade from Apple.

    4. I use the Adobe CS5 suite. Now that CS6 is out you can be almost sure that Adobe will not release a "Retina" patch for the older CS5 software. So for me that means either shelling out hundreds of dollars to upgrade to CS6, just so I can take advantage of the Retina display, or just running the system in the non-Retina 1680x1050 mode or 1920x1200 mode. I'd rather keep my CS5 for the time being and buy the non-Retina model that gives me 1680x1050 that can work with my existing software. This of course isn't Apple's fault, but I suspect that many people will be in this same situation as Adobe upgrades are expensive to keep up with and lots of people are running older versions.

    5. Yes you can get an adapter for the Thunderbolt port to make it into an Ethernet or Firewire port, but that's just one more thing to buy from Apple, adding even more to the cost difference.

    6. The battery life between the Retina and the non-Retina model is quoted by Apple to be exactly the same, so you don't get any more battery life out of the slimmer system.

    Hopefully this helps you understand my reasoning for not liking the Retina model. If I thought it was great and worth the money I would have kept it, so all I can leave you with is that I bought it, used it for several days, and ended up returning it and buying the 15" non-Retina model with the upgraded hi-res anti-glare screen and upgraded 750GB 7200RPM hard drive. Your mileage may vary but I stand by my review.

    ReplyDelete
  7. When I started reading about the MBP refresh some weeks ago I started to get really excited...and not because of the Retina display. I wanted a new MBP to replace my relatively slow 2009 Core2Duo model, and as the info and rumors started leaking out my level of excitement didn't change. I was fed up with Windows (Used it because it has decent hardware all around, including video, and was cheaper) and my current MBP was just too slow.

    When the launch was going on and they revealed the new models and specs, it didn't take long for me to decide I didn't want the Retina model. Sure, the Retina is a great display when used as designed, much like a Porsche GT3 is a great track-day car but not exactly one you'd want to for commuting in the city. Stray from the recommended settings or be stuck with non-Retina apps and you quickly discover that it's not the best display for everything no matter what.

    Add in the non-upgradeable memory and it's a dealbreaker. I couldn't do it.

    I bought a standard MBP with the 2.6GHz i7 and couldn't be happier. 90% of the time I have the thing connected to an external monitor so the Retina display would be unused. I'm already planning on upgrading to 16GB (Much cheaper than Apple's upgrade option, which isn't available yet. They only offer an 8GB kit, 2x4GB DIMMs, for $200 currently. There is no 16GB upgrade at this time.) as there have been times when 8GB barely cut it and I started to swap.

    That's not to say the Retina MBP isn't a nice laptop, it's very nice, but I don't consider it to be nearly as versatile as the regular MBP.

    IMO, it should have been called the "MacBook Air Pro", at least that would let people know it's not exactly a MBP or an Air.

    Some may consider something to be "Pro" level because of performance or looks alone, but when I think "Pro" I think versatile and able to be changed over time to do upgrades and be tweaked to fit a person's needs, not something small and unchangeable. All one has to do is compare "Pro" cameras with non-pro. Canon EOS Rebel vs. Dx or Dxx series. The pro models are bigger, heavier, have more options. and let you do more to/with them than the smaller, lighter models.

    For multiple reasons I decided to go with the standard MBP, mainly because my definition of Pro doesn't match Apple's when it comes to the Retina model.

    Ultimately, as long as people are happy with their choice then who cares what reasons we have for buying one or the other. I love my standard MBP and what it offers, I have no regrets about not buying the Retina model.

    ReplyDelete